As discussed in the previous post, modern translations of the Bible preserve only the words of the book of Psalms. The inevitable question which then arises is: "If the Psalms are supposed to be music, why is there no musical notation in the Bible?"
Good question. Some of the answers might surprise you.
For example, the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Hebrew Masoretic Text actually contain symbols called "cantillation signs" which have been used since ancient times to record music in written form. Sadly, the knowledge of how to correctly read those symbols in order to know what the music sounds like has been lost. But as we know, God is an expert at finding that which was lost! Musicologist Suzanne Haïk-Vantoura (1928–2000) studied these symbols extensively and was very successful in constructing a method to once again bring the music off the page and to our ears. In particular, Psalm 114 was reconstructed using this method. The result was a tune recognizable as the "tonus peregrinus," used in the Gregorian Chant of the ancient church. Click HERE to listen to it in English from the King James Bible!
"OK, that's cool, but if the music was there originally, why is it missing now?"
Another good question. I would like to offer ONE possible answer...
We are commanded in the Bible to "sing a NEW song" to the lord. The term "new song" appears nine times in the King James, and six of those are commands! Why is that important?
Because God is a creator. THE Creator, in fact. We know from studying the Bible that God wants us to become more like Him. "Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy." (Leviticus 19:2 and many other similar verses) This being true, it would logically follow that we should imitate God in all the ways we can. Thus, we should be creative, and this includes the realm of music. So when we are told to "sing a NEW song," that means that God really does want us to create new music!
"But... what's wrong with the old songs? Aren't they good enough?"